Sizing Up The Competition
Posted in Cognition on July 25th, 2009 by sam – Be the first to commentStephen Garcia & Avishalom Tor analyzed the results of the the Cognitive Reflection Test & the 2005 SAT exam. They calculated the average number of test-takers per venue in each state, and found that test scores fell as the number of people in the examination hall increased.
They then asked 74 university students to take a timed, easy general-knowledge quiz. Each student completed the test alone, but half were told they were competing against ten other people and the other half that they were competing against 100. All were informed that those whose completion times were in the top 20% would receive $5. Students who believed they were competing against only ten people finished in an average of 29 seconds. Those who believed they were competing against 100 averaged 33 seconds.
They then ran a 2nd experiment, & asked students to imagine they were running a five-kilometre race against 50 people and then against 500 (or, in half of the cases, the other way round). In both notional races the top 10% of competitors would get a $1,000 prize. The researchers told the students to rate, on a seven-point scale, how much faster than normal they would run in each notional race, with a one being slightly faster than normal and a seven being the fastest of their lives. The average value in the competition against 50 others was 5.4; in the competition against 500 it was 4.9. They then asked the participants a series of questions commonly used by psychologists to evaluate an individual’s tendency to compare himself with others in a social environment. They found that those with the highest tendency to make such comparisons had the lowest scores in the notional race against 500 others.